Survey Question # 10:
If Heavy Rail commuter service were provided for the Southern Chester County region, which of the following amenities would you like to see implemented? Please select any of the following options that apply:
On-Board Restrooms
Station Snack and Beverage Facility
Free Parking for Commuters
On-Board WiFi Internet Access
Station Newsstand/Bookstore/Stationer
Security/Police presence
Increased On-Board Workspace
Station Restrooms
Increased On-Board leg and shoulder room
Station ATM
Results:
FREQUENCIES: OB_RESTRM On-Board Restrooms
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 51 38.3 38.3 38.3
Marked 1 82 61.7 61.7 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .617 Std Err .042 Kurtosis -1.770 Median 1.000 Std Dev .488 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode 1.000 Variance .238 Skewness -.485 Minimum .000 Sum 82.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .5328 to .7003]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: STA_SNKBEV Station Snack & Beverage
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 100 75.2 75.2 75.2
Marked 1 33 24.8 24.8 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .248 Std Err .038 Kurtosis -.640 Median .000 Std Dev .434 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode .000 Variance .188 Skewness 1.180 Minimum .000 Sum 33.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .1738 to .3225]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: FREEPARK Free Parking
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 21 15.8 15.8 15.8
Marked 1 112 84.2 84.2 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .842 Std Err .032 Kurtosis 1.521 Median 1.000 Std Dev .366 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode 1.000 Variance .134 Skewness -1.898 Minimum .000 Sum 112.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .7793 to .9049]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: OB_INTERNT On-Board Internet
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 69 51.9 51.9 51.9
Marked 1 64 48.1 48.1 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .481 Std Err .043 Kurtosis -1.994 Median .000 Std Dev .502 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode .000 Variance .252 Skewness .076 Minimum .000 Sum 64.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .3952 to .5672]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: STA_NEWS Station Newsstand
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 103 77.4 77.4 77.4
Marked 1 30 22.6 22.6 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .226 Std Err .036 Kurtosis -.275 Median .000 Std Dev .420 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode .000 Variance .176 Skewness 1.328 Minimum .000 Sum 30.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .1536 to .2975]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: SECURITY Security/Police
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 51 38.3 38.3 38.3
Marked 1 82 61.7 61.7 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .617 Std Err .042 Kurtosis -1.770 Median 1.000 Std Dev .488 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode 1.000 Variance .238 Skewness -.485 Minimum .000 Sum 82.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .5328 to .7003]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: OB_WRKSPC Increased OB Workspace
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 108 81.2 81.2 81.2
Marked 1 25 18.8 18.8 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .188 Std Err .034 Kurtosis .551 Median .000 Std Dev .392 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode .000 Variance .154 Skewness 1.616 Minimum .000 Sum 25.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .1207 to .2552]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: STA_RESTRM Station Restrooms
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 57 42.9 42.9 42.9
Marked 1 76 57.1 57.1 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .571 Std Err .043 Kurtosis -1.917 Median 1.000 Std Dev .497 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode 1.000 Variance .247 Skewness -.292 Minimum .000 Sum 76.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .4862 to .6566]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: OB_PERS_RM OB Personal Room
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 89 66.9 66.9 66.9
Marked 1 44 33.1 33.1 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .331 Std Err .041 Kurtosis -1.483 Median .000 Std Dev .472 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode .000 Variance .223 Skewness .727 Minimum .000 Sum 44.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .2498 to .4118]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: STA_ATM Station ATM
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Unmarked 0 104 78.2 78.2 78.2
Marked 1 29 21.8 21.8 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .218 Std Err .036 Kurtosis -.135 Median .000 Std Dev .414 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode .000 Variance .172 Skewness 1.381 Minimum .000 Sum 29.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .1470 to .2891]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0