FREQUENCIES: AGERANGE Age Range
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
< 18 years old 0 2 1.5 1.5 1.5
18 to 25 years old 1 1 .8 .8 2.3
26 to 35 years old 2 20 15.0 15.0 17.3
36 to 45 years old 3 28 21.1 21.1 38.3
46 to 55 years old 4 45 33.8 33.8 72.2
56 to 65 years old 5 26 19.5 19.5 91.7
66 to 75 years old 6 9 6.8 6.8 98.5
76 to 85 years old 7 2 1.5 1.5 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean 3.782 Std Err .113 Kurtosis .140 Median 4.000 Std Dev 1.299 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode 4.000 Variance 1.687 Skewness -.154 Minimum .000 Sum 503.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 7.000 Range 7.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ 3.5592 to 4.0047]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: CLASS Job Classification
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Not Available 0 6 4.5 4.9 4.9
Unskilled Labor 1 11 8.3 8.9 13.8
Skilled Labor 2 10 7.5 8.1 22.0
Semi-Professional 3 16 12.0 13.0 35.0
Professional 4 74 55.6 60.2 95.1
Other 5 6 4.5 4.9 100.0
10 7.5 MISSING
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean 3.293 Std Err .114 Kurtosis .563 Median 4.000 Std Dev 1.266 S.E. Kurt. .442 Mode 4.000 Variance 1.602 Skewness -1.285 Minimum .000 Sum 405.000 S.E. Skew. .221 Maximum 5.000 Range 5.000 Valid 123.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ 3.0668 to 3.5186]
VALID CASES: 123 MISSING CASES: 10
FREQUENCIES: COMMUNITY Community
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Aldan - want to move back 0 1 .8 .8 .8
Aston, Delaware County, P 1 1 .8 .8 1.6
atglen 2 1 .8 .8 2.3
Avondale 3 2 1.5 1.6 3.9
Center City Philadelphia 4 1 .8 .8 4.7
Chadds Ford 5 1 .8 .8 5.5
Christiana 6 1 .8 .8 6.3
cochranville 7 3 2.3 2.3 8.6
Downingtown 8 1 .8 .8 9.4
East Nottingham 9 9 6.8 7.0 16.4
East Nottingham, Pa 10 1 .8 .8 17.2
East Nottingham/Oxford 11 1 .8 .8 18.0
Exton 12 1 .8 .8 18.8
Fair Hill in rural Cecil 13 1 .8 .8 19.5
franklin township 14 1 .8 .8 20.3
Glen Roy 15 1 .8 .8 21.1
kennett square 16 2 1.5 1.6 22.7
Kirkwood 17 1 .8 .8 23.4
Kirkwood PA 18 2 1.5 1.6 25.0
Kirkwood, PA 19 1 .8 .8 25.8
Landenberg 20 1 .8 .8 26.6
Linc Univ 21 1 .8 .8 27.3
lincoln univ. 22 1 .8 .8 28.1
Lincoln University 23 5 3.8 3.9 32.0
Londonderry Township 24 1 .8 .8 32.8
lower oxford 25 9 6.8 7.0 39.8
Lower Oxford Township 26 1 .8 .8 40.6
Lower Oxford Twp. 27 1 .8 .8 41.4
New London 28 1 .8 .8 42.2
Nottingham 29 4 3.0 3.1 45.3
Nottingham (West) 30 1 .8 .8 46.1
Ovations at Elkview (West 31 1 .8 .8 46.9
Oxford 32 38 28.6 29.7 76.6
Oxford Boro. 33 1 .8 .8 77.3
oxford borough 34 4 3.0 3.1 80.5
oxford pa 35 1 .8 .8 81.3
Oxford Pa. 36 1 .8 .8 82.0
oxford, pa 37 5 3.8 3.9 85.9
Oxford. PA 38 1 .8 .8 86.7
Oxford` 39 1 .8 .8 87.5
Parkesburg 40 1 .8 .8 88.3
phila.-moving to landenbe 41 1 .8 .8 89.1
Swarthmore 42 1 .8 .8 89.8
Upper Oxford Twp. 43 1 .8 .8 90.6
west grove 44 3 2.3 2.3 93.0
West Grove Area 45 1 .8 .8 93.8
West Nottingham 46 5 3.8 3.9 97.7
West Nottingham twp 47 1 .8 .8 98.4
Whiteford, MD 48 1 .8 .8 99.2
wyncote 49 1 .8 .8 100.0
5 3.8 MISSING
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
*** Unable to compute statistics on string variable ***
VALID CASES: 128 MISSING CASES: 5
FREQUENCIES: GENDER Gender
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Not Available 0 4 3.0 3.0 3.0
Male 1 55 41.4 41.4 44.4
Female 2 74 55.6 55.6 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean 1.526 Std Err .048 Kurtosis -.672 Median 2.000 Std Dev .558 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode 2.000 Variance .312 Skewness -.635 Minimum .000 Sum 203.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 2.000 Range 2.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ 1.4305 to 1.6221]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: MTSCONTACT Contact
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
No 0 88 66.2 66.2 66.2
Yes 1 45 33.8 33.8 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean .338 Std Err .041 Kurtosis -1.533 Median .000 Std Dev .475 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode .000 Variance .226 Skewness .691 Minimum .000 Sum 45.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 1.000 Range 1.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ .2569 to .4198]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: OCCUPATION Occupation
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Not Available 0 1 .8 .8 .8
Homemaker 1 8 6.0 6.0 6.8
Student 2 2 1.5 1.5 8.3
Employed 3 92 69.2 69.2 77.4
Self-Employed 4 14 10.5 10.5 88.0
Semi-Retired 5 5 3.8 3.8 91.7
Retired 6 8 6.0 6.0 97.7
Other 7 3 2.3 2.3 100.0
–––––––– ––––––– –––––––
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean 3.293 Std Err .103 Kurtosis 2.357 Median 3.000 Std Dev 1.186 S.E. Kurt. .425 Mode 3.000 Variance 1.406 Skewness .934 Minimum .000 Sum 438.000 S.E. Skew. .212 Maximum 7.000 Range 7.000 Valid 133.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ 3.0899 to 3.4966]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
FREQUENCIES: POSTALCODE
Valid Cum
Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
19 1 .8 .8 .8
10352 1 .8 .8 1.6
17509 1 .8 .8 2.3
17536 4 3.0 3.1 5.4
19014 1 .8 .8 6.2
19018 1 .8 .8 7.0
19081 1 .8 .8 7.8
19107 1 .8 .8 8.5
19148 1 .8 .8 9.3
19310 1 .8 .8 10.1
19311 2 1.5 1.6 11.6
19317 1 .8 .8 12.4
19330 5 3.8 3.9 16.3
19335 1 .8 .8 17.1
19341 1 .8 .8 17.8
19348 2 1.5 1.6 19.4
19350 2 1.5 1.6 20.9
19352 7 5.3 5.4 26.4
19362 12 9.0 9.3 35.7
19363 75 56.4 58.1 93.8
19365 1 .8 .8 94.6
19390 4 3.0 3.1 97.7
19636 1 .8 .8 98.4
21160 1 .8 .8 99.2
21921 1 .8 .8 100.0
4 3.0 MISSING
-------- ------- -------
TOTAL 133 100.0 100.0
Mean 19093.318 Std Err 169.268 Kurtosis 76.723 Median 19363.000 Std Dev 1922.515 S.E. Kurt. .431 Mode 19363.000 Variance 3696065.17 Skewness -8.480 Minimum 19.000 Sum 2463038.000 S.E. Skew. .216 Maximum 21921.000 Range 21902.000 Valid 129.000
95% Confidence Interval for the mean = [ 18758 to 19428]
VALID CASES: 129 MISSING CASES: 4
CROSSTAB:
OCCUPATION Occupation by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
| lable | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
OCCUPATION–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+––––––––
0 | 1 | | | 1
Not Available | | | | .8
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
1 | | 4 | 4 | 8
Homemaker | | | | 6.0
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
2 | | 1 | 1 | 2
Student | | | | 1.5
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
3 | 1 | 36 | 55 | 92
Employed | | | | 69.2
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 14
Self-Employed | | | | 10.5
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
5 | | 2 | 3 | 5
Semi-Retired | | | | 3.8
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
6 | | 3 | 5 | 8
Retired | | | | 6.0
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
7 | | 1 | 2 | 3
Other | | | | 2.3
–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
Column 4 55 74 133
Total 3.0 41.4 55.6 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance –––––––––– ––––– –––– ––––––––––––
Pearson 43.6286 14 .0001 Likelihood ratio 16.9884 14 .2568
Smallest expected frequency = .030 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 20 of 24 (83.3%)
Statistic Value Significance ––––––––– ––––– –––––––––––
Cramer's V .40499 Contingency Coefficient .49700 Pearson's correlation .05119 .5584 Spearman's Rho -.0323 .7122 Gamma -.0558
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
CROSSTAB:
CLASS Job Classification by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
| lable | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
CLASS –––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+––––––––
0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6
Not Available | | | | 4.9
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
1 | | 5 | 6 | 11
Unskilled Labor | | | | 8.9
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
2 | | 5 | 5 | 10
Skilled Labor | | | | 8.1
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
3 | | 5 | 11 | 16
Semi-Professiona | | | | 13.0
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
4 | 2 | 33 | 39 | 74
Professional | | | | 60.2
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
5 | | | 6 | 6
Other | | | | 4.9
–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
Column 4 49 70 123
Total 3.3 39.8 56.9 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance –––––––––– ––––– –––– ––––––––––––
Pearson 25.1508 10 .0051 Likelihood ratio 17.7848 10 .0587
Smallest expected frequency = .195 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 12 of 18 (66.7%)
Statistic Value Significance ––––––––– ––––– –––––––––––
Cramer's V .31975 Contingency Coefficient .41203 Pearson's correlation .11150 .2195 Spearman's Rho .07200 .4287 Gamma .11895
VALID CASES: 123 MISSING CASES: 10
CROSSTAB:
OCCUPATION Occupation by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
Tot Pct | lable | | |
Exp Val | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
OCCUPATION–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+––––––––
0 | 1 | | | 1
Not Available | .8 | .0 | .0 | .8
| .0 | .4 | .6 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
1 | | 4 | 4 | 8
Homemaker | .0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 6.0
| .2 | 3.3 | 4.5 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
2 | | 1 | 1 | 2
Student | .0 | .8 | .8 | 1.5
| .1 | .8 | 1.1 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
3 | 1 | 36 | 55 | 92
Employed | .8 | 27.1 | 41.4 | 69.2
| 2.8 | 38.0 | 51.2 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 14
Self-Employed | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 10.5
| .4 | 5.8 | 7.8 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
5 | | 2 | 3 | 5
Semi-Retired | .0 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 3.8
| .2 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
6 | | 3 | 5 | 8
Retired | .0 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 6.0
| .2 | 3.3 | 4.5 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
7 | | 1 | 2 | 3
Other | .0 | .8 | 1.5 | 2.3
| .1 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
Column 4 55 74 133
Total 3.0 41.4 55.6 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance –––––––––– ––––– –––– ––––––––––––
Pearson 43.6286 14 .0001 Likelihood ratio 16.9884 14 .2568
Smallest expected frequency = .030 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 20 of 24 (83.3%)
Statistic Value Significance ––––––––– ––––– –––––––––––
Cramer's V .40499 Contingency Coefficient .49700 Pearson's correlation .05119 .5584 Spearman's Rho -.0323 .7122 Gamma -.0558
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
CROSSTAB:
CLASS Job Classification by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
Tot Pct | lable | | |
Exp Val | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
CLASS –––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+––––––––
0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6
Not Available | 1.6 | .8 | 2.4 | 4.9
| .2 | 2.4 | 3.4 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
1 | | 5 | 6 | 11
Unskilled Labor | .0 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 8.9
| .4 | 4.4 | 6.3 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
2 | | 5 | 5 | 10
Skilled Labor | .0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 8.1
| .3 | 4.0 | 5.7 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
3 | | 5 | 11 | 16
Semi-Professiona | .0 | 4.1 | 8.9 | 13.0
| .5 | 6.4 | 9.1 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
4 | 2 | 33 | 39 | 74
Professional | 1.6 | 26.8 | 31.7 | 60.2
| 2.4 | 29.5 | 42.1 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
5 | | | 6 | 6
Other | .0 | .0 | 4.9 | 4.9
| .2 | 2.4 | 3.4 |
–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
Column 4 49 70 123
Total 3.3 39.8 56.9 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance –––––––––– ––––– –––– ––––––––––––
Pearson 25.1508 10 .0051 Likelihood ratio 17.7848 10 .0587
Smallest expected frequency = .195 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 12 of 18 (66.7%)
Statistic Value Significance ––––––––– ––––– –––––––––––
Cramer's V .31975 Contingency Coefficient .41203 Pearson's correlation .11150 .2195 Spearman's Rho .07200 .4287 Gamma .11895
VALID CASES: 123 MISSING CASES: 10
CROSSTAB:
AGERANGE Age Range by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
Tot Pct | lable | | |
Exp Val | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
AGERANGE ---------+---------+---------+---------+--------
0 | | 2 | | 2
< 18 years old | .0 | 1.5 | .0 | 1.5
| .1 | .8 | 1.1 |
+---------+---------+---------+
1 | | 1 | | 1
18 to 25 years o | .0 | .8 | .0 | .8
| .0 | .4 | .6 |
+---------+---------+---------+
2 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 20
26 to 35 years o | .8 | 3.0 | 11.3 | 15.0
| .6 | 8.3 | 11.1 |
+---------+---------+---------+
3 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 28
36 to 45 years o | .8 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 21.1
| .8 | 11.6 | 15.6 |
+---------+---------+---------+
4 | 1 | 17 | 27 | 45
46 to 55 years o | .8 | 12.8 | 20.3 | 33.8
| 1.4 | 18.6 | 25.0 |
+---------+---------+---------+
5 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 26
56 to 65 years o | .8 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 19.5
| .8 | 10.8 | 14.5 |
+---------+---------+---------+
6 | | 6 | 3 | 9
66 to 75 years o | .0 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 6.8
| .3 | 3.7 | 5.0 |
+---------+---------+---------+
7 | | | 2 | 2
76 to 85 years o | .0 | .0 | 1.5 | 1.5
| .1 | .8 | 1.1 |
---------+---------+---------+---------+
Column 4 55 74 133
Total 3.0 41.4 55.6 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance ---------- ----- ---- ------------
Pearson 13.2393 14 .5078 Likelihood ratio 15.5686 14 .3404
Smallest expected frequency = .030 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 15 of 24 (62.5%)
Statistic Value Significance --------- ----- -----------
Cramer's V .22310 Contingency Coefficient .30089 Pearson's correlation -.0181 .8358 Spearman's Rho -.0576 .5104 Gamma -.0795
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
CROSSTAB:
MTSCONTACT Contact by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
Tot Pct | lable | | |
Exp Val | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
MTSCONTACT–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+––––––––
0 | 3 | 33 | 52 | 88
No | 2.3 | 24.8 | 39.1 | 66.2
| 2.6 | 36.4 | 49.0 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
1 | 1 | 22 | 22 | 45
Yes | .8 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 33.8
| 1.4 | 18.6 | 25.0 |
–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
Column 4 55 74 133
Total 3.0 41.4 55.6 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance –––––––––– ––––– –––– ––––––––––––
Pearson 1.6303 2 .4426 Likelihood ratio 1.6256 2 .4436
Smallest expected frequency = 1.353 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 2 of 6 (33.3%)
Statistic Value Significance ––––––––– ––––– –––––––––––
Cramer's V .11072 Contingency Coefficient .11004 Pearson's correlation -.0767 .3804 Spearman's Rho -.0882 .3125 Gamma -.1778
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
CROSSTAB:
OCCUPATION Occupation by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
Tot Pct | lable | | |
Exp Val | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
OCCUPATION–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+––––––––
0 | 1 | | | 1
Not Available | .8 | .0 | .0 | .8
| .0 | .4 | .6 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
1 | | 4 | 4 | 8
Homemaker | .0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 6.0
| .2 | 3.3 | 4.5 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
2 | | 1 | 1 | 2
Student | .0 | .8 | .8 | 1.5
| .1 | .8 | 1.1 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
3 | 1 | 36 | 55 | 92
Employed | .8 | 27.1 | 41.4 | 69.2
| 2.8 | 38.0 | 51.2 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 14
Self-Employed | 1.5 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 10.5
| .4 | 5.8 | 7.8 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
5 | | 2 | 3 | 5
Semi-Retired | .0 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 3.8
| .2 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
6 | | 3 | 5 | 8
Retired | .0 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 6.0
| .2 | 3.3 | 4.5 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
7 | | 1 | 2 | 3
Other | .0 | .8 | 1.5 | 2.3
| .1 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
Column 4 55 74 133
Total 3.0 41.4 55.6 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance –––––––––– ––––– –––– ––––––––––––
Pearson 43.6286 14 .0001 Likelihood ratio 16.9884 14 .2568
Smallest expected frequency = .030 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 20 of 24 (83.3%)
Statistic Value Significance ––––––––– ––––– –––––––––––
Cramer's V .40499 Contingency Coefficient .49700 Pearson's correlation .05119 .5584 Spearman's Rho -.0323 .7122 Gamma -.0558
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
CROSSTAB:
CLASS Job Classification by GENDER Gender
GENDER->
Count | Not Avai| Male | Female |
Tot Pct | lable | | |
Exp Val | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | Total
CLASS –––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+––––––––
0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6
Not Available | 1.6 | .8 | 2.4 | 4.9
| .2 | 2.4 | 3.4 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
1 | | 5 | 6 | 11
Unskilled Labor | .0 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 8.9
| .4 | 4.4 | 6.3 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
2 | | 5 | 5 | 10
Skilled Labor | .0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 8.1
| .3 | 4.0 | 5.7 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
3 | | 5 | 11 | 16
Semi-Professiona | .0 | 4.1 | 8.9 | 13.0
| .5 | 6.4 | 9.1 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
4 | 2 | 33 | 39 | 74
Professional | 1.6 | 26.8 | 31.7 | 60.2
| 2.4 | 29.5 | 42.1 |
+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
5 | | | 6 | 6
Other | .0 | .0 | 4.9 | 4.9
| .2 | 2.4 | 3.4 |
–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+–––––––––+
Column 4 49 70 123
Total 3.3 39.8 56.9 100.0
Chi-Square Value D.F. Significance –––––––––– ––––– –––– ––––––––––––
Pearson 25.1508 10 .0051 Likelihood ratio 17.7848 10 .0587
Smallest expected frequency = .195 Cells with expected frequency less than 5 = 12 of 18 (66.7%)
Statistic Value Significance ––––––––– ––––– –––––––––––
Cramer's V .31975 Contingency Coefficient .41203 Pearson's correlation .11150 .2195 Spearman's Rho .07200 .4287 Gamma .11895
VALID CASES: 123 MISSING CASES: 10
PAIRED SAMPLES T-TEST:
OCCUPATION Occupation by GENDER Gender
Variable Number Standard Standard
of Cases Mean Deviation Error
GENDER 133 1.526 .558 .048
OCCUPATION 133 3.293 1.186 .103
Difference Standard Standard | 2-tail | t Degree of 2-tail
Mean Deviation Error | Corr. Prob. | Value freedom Prob.
| |
-1.7669 1.2844 .1114 | .051 .558 | -15.86 132 .000
Effect size statistics
Statistics 95% Confidence Interval
r = -.8099 [ -.8605 to -.7407]
d = -2.761 [ -3.378 to -2.205]
VALID CASES: 133 MISSING CASES: 0
PAIRED SAMPLES T-TEST:
CLASS Job Classification by GENDER Gender
Variable Number Standard Standard
of Cases Mean Deviation Error
GENDER 123 1.537 .562 .051
CLASS 123 3.293 1.266 .114
Difference Standard Standard | 2-tail | t Degree of 2-tail
Mean Deviation Error | Corr. Prob. | Value freedom Prob.
| |
-1.7561 1.3265 .1196 | .111 .220 | -14.68 122 .000
Effect size statistics
Statistics 95% Confidence Interval
r = -.7991 [ -.8542 to -.7232]
d = -2.658 [ -3.285 to -2.094]
VALID CASES: 123 MISSING CASES: 10